Random Pains In Groin???

NO TO A FALSE HISTORY, NO TO A PARTY AND FEMINIST Fake!

The Truth about Women's Day is little known. That's why this is the case, again, to rehabilitate the true story to the false story that we are dished up at school, on TV and in newspapers!

We propose, therefore, an article that reveals the lies propinateci for more than eighty years on the 8 March.

Alessandra Nucci, a scholar of feminism: on 8 March as International Women's Day dates back to the Third Communist International in 1921 in Moscow, where Lenin launched the "International Workers' Day"
And today, at a time when you want it all "natural" and "holistic", we try at all costs to manipulate the natural physiology of the woman, spin-offs like a motherhood issue additional
Women's Day has become over the years a growing ideological value, the point of being radical expression of a culture that identifies the female figure as a rebel against the natural characteristics of mother and wife.
After decades in which this ideology has prevailed prevailed, now seems to emerge a new culture that refers to teaching and Christian anthropology.
To learn more, ZENIT interviewed Dr. Alessandra Nucci, Director of the magazine "A voice cries out ...!" and scholar of the phenomena that refer to feminism and all'ecofemminismo. The
Nucci is also responsible for the area, "Women and Culture" of the Group for Research and Information Socio-religious (GRIS).
What is the history and significance of 8 March. It 'a real party for women?
feminist mythology handed down for decades, the story that the date 8 March was chosen at the second International Conference of Socialist Women in Copenhagen in 1910 to commemorate the massacre of over one hundred workers of a shirt in New York, trapped in a fire set by the owner of the factory to exact revenge on a strike.
few years ago someone went to comb through the chronicles true, and it was reported that there was such a terrible fire, but that was not attributable either to strike or a lockout, which made victims among men, and in 1911 One year after Copenhagen.
So now known that the versions that are made are varied, but always trying to remember some negative event that would happen in America. In reality, the establishment of 8 March as International Women's Day dates back to the Third Communist International held in Moscow in 1921, where it was launched by Lenin as "International Workers' Day" in honor of the first event of the workers of St. Petersburg against the Tsarism.
The story of a March 8 established in memory of a massacre result of hatred and the capitalist class was the work of the Italian Communist Party in 1952, in the Cold War, published this chronicle of real fire, but handled in an anti-American. The version was revived by Italian women, the female sector of the CGIL union, to organize the celebration of 8 March this year, and then by the same CGIL, who embroidered it further, adding more characters to the story two years later.
The story is indicative of the hegemony sought and, eventually obtained by the Italian left on the applications of women, even today, where often the voice of those who left is not collecting the same themes, the same passwords. So on March 8 in Italy is actually experienced as a general holiday for all women.
Just this week they are discussing NEW YORK (Beijing + 10), THE PLATFORM FOR ACTION VOTED THE UN CONFERENCE IN BEIJING (1995) on women's rights. There is considerable CONTROVERSY CONCERNING ABORTION FOR MANY is a right, an act of freedom and progress of the female. What do you think?
When in Italy in the seventies, held a referendum on abortion, many people were voting for the liberalization because we are convinced of the need to put an end to a very high number of illegal abortions. Today, however, went far beyond this concept of "lesser evil", and a certain kind of radical feminism has given the dignity of abortion banner of freedom, an achievement that we should be very proud. Some people even want to make it a human right, in the name of life. The woman's life, of course, without regard to the life of the child.
The woman wants to present as threatened not only the incidence of mortality from illegal abortions, which is deemed high, but also from the fact of pregnancy and motherhood. It 'amazing how in an age where you want everything to be "natural" and "holistic", we should at all costs to manipulate the natural physiology of women, separating motherhood looks like a add-on.
is preparing a book about feminism and ANTIVIR SOME POLICIES OF UNITED NATIONS AGENCIES ARE CHARGED BY THE END OF THE SIXTIES. HOW DOES THE FEMINIST CULTURE HAS BEEN INSTRUMENTAL IMPLEMENTATION OF PROGRAMS FOR THE REDUCTION OF BIRTH?
demographic policies of the United Nations created the desire to prevent what is perceived as an impending demographic catastrophe, although the data say otherwise. There is no doubt however that the revived feminism nineties has given a new legitimacy to these policies and militancy, especially with the banner of "reproductive rights".
According to these feminists, members of government delegations and non-governmental, but also included so many different levels of the same UN system, is of paramount importance to liberalize abortion and contraception to flood the world, because the primary asset of the woman - who knows it or not - would be to reduce the maternity option to marginal compared to the really important things in life.
WHAT DO YOU THINK OF THE EARTH CHARTER THAT SOME WOULD REPLACE THE DECLARATION OF UNIVERSAL HUMAN RIGHTS ADOPTED BY THE UNITED NATIONS GENERAL ASSEMBLY ON 10 DECEMBER 1948?
I could not express myself better by Professor Michael Schooyans, to say that the Earth Charter is an anti-Christian ideological tool, useful to "legitimize policies of population control worldwide, especially towards the poorest."
summer of last year, the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith published a document in which ANALYZE THE FEMINIST IDEOLOGY AND COMPARE WITH THE CHRISTIAN CULTURE. What is your opinion on this?
The document signed by Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger and Archbishop Angelo Amato has the advantage to warn women against the risk of encouraging the creation of a society where the conditions of mankind, and then the woman herself, will be much worse now. We must realize that campaigns for the woman actually target the whole of society. Now realize this in a few, but enough that women will become fully aware: then they will be able, together with men, to reverse the entire course of history.

Source: Zenit, 7 Mar. 2005

Where To Get Doctors Note Toronto

DE LOVE: Second point: The man and woman. Different and complementary.


"Then the Lord God formed man of dust from the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life and man became a living being. "[Gen 2.7]
" Then the Lord God said <> "[Gen 2.18]
" Then the man said << Questa volta essa è carne della mia carne e osso dalle mie ossa. La si chiamerà donna perché dall’uomo è stata tolta.>> "[2, Gen 23] To begin

a trail comprehensive and broad-minded, it is necessary to start from the principle that the discovery and knowledge of the protagonists of this book. The man and woman.
It 's the case, in the confusion of our day, stressing the difference that makes only two sexes, it is diversity that stems from their complementarity. God first created the world and above it there He put the man, but, immediately, he realized that he could not live alone, who needed help and then he created woman from man himself.
Neglect of controversy and false pseudo issues related to the figure of Adam and Eve, and raised by some atheist-materialist ideology, it is helpful to cite the Compendium of the Catechism of the Catholic Church, when in the third devoted to the Sixth Commandment in section 487 says, "God created man male and female, with equal dignity, and has joined him in the vocation of love and communion. Everyone should accept their sexual identity, ricocendone the importance for the whole person, the specificity and complementarity. " The Catechism then, aims to enhance the separate identity of the man and woman who is physically represented. The difference, from a purely physical factor, it is grossly enlarged to all those boundaries that characterize the ways and customs of the society. The battles feminist, Marxist, for a revaluation of the female, have done nothing but destroy the healthy distinction meant that men and women could be considered of equal dignity, but with the necessary characteristics. The desire to approve the male, to create equal opportunities, has led to the trivialization of the human person in general. The feminist revolution has allowed that the mechanisms of Marxist ideology insane crush any possibility of real "redemption" of the woman. No one wants to challenge that abuse, torture, servility and slavery, were still backward habits and forms (but not universally) hindered the full understanding and exaltation of the feminine universe, but it has gone from a surplus to ' another, that is subjected to the self selfish ego, forgetting the purpose for which man and woman were created as such. To support this you can mention in the book \\ interview by Vittorio Messori in conversation with J. Ratzinger, the answer to the trivialization of sex (due to this relaxation of morals) in which he spoke, the then Cardinal: "Male? Female? These are questions that some are now old, meaningless, if not racist. The response of the current conformism is predictable: <> This is really serious but it seems very nice and generous: it means that sexuality is no longer seen as rooted in anthropology, is that sex is seen as interchangeable in a simple role pleasure "[...]" it follows logically consistent that the whole being and all the actions of the human person are reduced to pure functionality. " From these statements of topical surprising, clearly reflected the problem of "exchange" of sex, as if it were a usual costume and possible. Nothing could be further from the truth. The simple reflection that arises from this statement is this: Diversity is not something that discriminates, but on the contrary, is intended to enhance skills and qualities that make the sexes prerogative essential for the survival of the other. Men and women are inseparable. This does not mean that it is less, but that its existence is tied to that of man.
Being different, in mutual respect and diversity is essential to preserve, to understand the different attitudes, behaviors and roles within the couple and society.

VALENTINA Ragaglia